Re: Streaming replication status
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B4A3435.6070106@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication status (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> We need monitoring anywhere we have a max_* parameter. Otherwise we > won't know how close we are to disaster until we hit the limit and > things break down. Otherwise we will have to set parameters by trial and > error, or set them so high they are meaningless. I agree. Thing is, though, we have a de-facto max already ... when pgxlog runs out of disk space. And no monitoring *in postgresql* for that, although obviously you can use OS monitoring for it. I'm saying, even for plain PITR, it would be an improvement in manageablity if the DBA could set a maximum number of checkpoint segments before replication is abandonded or the master shuts down. It's something we've been missing. --Josh Berkus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: