Re: Application name patch - v3
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Application name patch - v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B425F4D.5070305@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v3 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 29/12/2009 14:12, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : > Le 29/12/2009 00:03, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >> Le 28/12/2009 22:59, Tom Lane a écrit : >>> Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes: >>>> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a écrit : >>>>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array >>>>> or two parallel arrays. Do you want to try coding up a sample usage >>>>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful? >>> >>>> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk >>>> about this. >>> >>> Try here >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com >>> >> >> Thanks. I've read all the "new version of PQconnectdb" and "Determining >> client_encoding from client locale" threads. I think I understand the >> goal. Still need to re-read this one >> (http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/6222.1253734019@sss.pgh.pa.us) and >> completely understand it (will probably need to look at the code, at >> least the PQconnectdb one). But I'm definitely working on this. >> > > If I try to sum up my readings so far, this is what we still have to do: > > 1. try the one-array approach > PGconn *PQconnectParams(const char **params) > > 2. try the two-arrays approach > PGconn *PQconnectParams(const char **keywords, const char **values) > > Instead of doing a wrapper around PQconnectdb, we need to refactor the > whole function, so that we can get rid of the parsing of the conninfo > string (which is quite complicated). > > Using psql as an example would be a good idea, AFAICT. > > Am I right? did I misunderstand or forget something? > I supposed I was right since noone yell at me :) I worked on this tonight. You'll find two patches attached, one for the one-array approach, one for the two-arrays approach. I know some more factoring can be done (at least, the "get the fallback resources..." part). I'm OK to do them. I just need to know if I'm on the right track. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: