Re: Application name patch - v3
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Application name patch - v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B393951.9010609@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 28/12/2009 22:59, Tom Lane a écrit : > Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes: >> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a écrit : >>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array >>> or two parallel arrays. Do you want to try coding up a sample usage >>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful? > >> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk >> about this. > > Try here > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com > Thanks. I've read all the "new version of PQconnectdb" and "Determining client_encoding from client locale" threads. I think I understand the goal. Still need to re-read this one (http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/6222.1253734019@sss.pgh.pa.us) and completely understand it (will probably need to look at the code, at least the PQconnectdb one). But I'm definitely working on this. -- Guillaume.http://www.postgresqlfr.orghttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: