Re: SATA drives performance
От | Richard Neill |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SATA drives performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B34040F.6060405@cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SATA drives performance (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SATA drives performance
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Richard Neill <rn214@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> This isn't true. IBMs IPS series controllers can the checked and >>> configured via the ipssend utility that works very well in 2.6.x LINUX. >>> >> Unfortunately, what we got (in the IBM) was the garbage ServeRaid 8kl card. >> This one is atrocious - it shipped with a hideous firmware bug. And there is >> no way to bypass it. >> > Can you replace the IBM RAID controller with some other controller? > Even just a simple 4 or 8 port SATA card with no RAID capability would > be better than something that locks up. A replacement would have been nice, however the 8kl is very tightly integrated with the motherboard and the backplane. We'd have had to buy a PCI-X card, and then get out the soldering iron to fix the cables. To be fair, the 8kl is now working OK; also there was a note in the box mentioning that firmware updates should be applied if available. What I found unbelievable was that IBM shipped the server to me in a state with known crashing firmware (a sufficiently bad bug imho to merit a product recall), and hadn't bothered to flash it themselves in the factory. Usually BIOS updates are only applied by the end user if there is a specific issue to fix, and if the product line has been out for years, but that particular server was only assembled 3 weeks ago, why would one expect a company of IBM's standing to ship it in that state. Richard
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: