Re: SATA drives performance
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SATA drives performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B338E0D.3030309@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SATA drives performance (Richard Neill <rn214@cam.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: SATA drives performance
Re: SATA drives performance |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Richard Neill wrote: > 3. RAID 0 is twice as unreliable as no raid. I'd recommend using RAID 1 > intead. If you use the Linux software mdraid, remote admin is easy. The main thing to be wary of with Linux software RAID-1 is that you configure things so that both drives are capable of booting the system. It's easy to mirror the data, but not the boot loader and the like. > 7. If you have 3 equal disks, try doing some experiments. My inclination > would be to set them all up with ext4... I have yet to yet a single positive thing about using ext4 for PostgreSQL. Stick with ext3, where the problems you might run into are at least well understood and performance is predictable. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: