Re: One question on the Restore window
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One question on the Restore window |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B30CB03.3090004@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One question on the Restore window (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 22/12/2009 10:39, Dave Page a écrit : > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I worked today on the restore window. I added all the missing options >> (with a release check for some of them), and I added sizers to have a >> good UI. You can see the result in the screenshots attached (from >> frmRestore_1.png to frmRestore_3.png). >> >> I have some problems with the UI of the backup TOC. I want to allow >> users to restore only some selected objects of the backup. Right now, >> the restore window allows only to restore one object, even if you >> selected more than one. So I try to find a good UI for this. I see two >> ways for doing it: >> >> * Keep the list, adding checkbox (see frmRestore_5.png). >> * Replace the list with a tree (see frmRestore_4.png). >> >> The tree is more appealing, really simple to understand. Anyone who used >> the backup window can use the restore window... Well, not really. If a >> user wants to restore some tables but not the schema, he needs to >> unselect the schema, and then to select the tables. It feels a bit >> awkward to see the schema not selected when some of its own tables are. >> Moreover, the list is really simpler to remember the order of the >> objects (the tree kind of destroys the order). But this is not really >> important. I'm much more bothered with the fact that we can have some >> tables selected and that the schema they belong to is not. > > Following the design of the backup window is preferrable certainly. > I'm not sure I'm too worried about the selection issue - most people > will never use it I imagine, and if they do, they probably only want > to restore a small number of tables, so deselecting the schema gives > them a blank list to do that. > OK, I dropped the list, and I'll now work on the use of the tree widget. Thanks for your answer. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: