Re: Interesting Benchmark Article
От | Howard Cole |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interesting Benchmark Article |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B28E5F9.5030605@selestial.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interesting Benchmark Article (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote: > Howard Cole wrote: >> Postgres comes out on top for most of the benchmarks against MySQL >> and SQL Server, in fact in the authors original article he goes as >> far as recommending using Postgres. More interestingly, the article >> seems to indicate that W2K8 server is faster for postgres than Linux >> in many of the scenarios. > I wouldn't go that far. The numbers are all really close for the > PostgreSQL results, and his results don't deserve nearly as many > significant digits as shown on his spreadsheet. And the PHP > implementation used has more impact on results in some cases than the > OS change. For all we know the entirety of the difference relates to, > say, the quality of the PostgreSQL PHP driver on the two platforms. > There's not enough data here to prove anything beyond "for this simple > PHP test, PostgreSQL performs the same on Windows and Linux, MySQL > matches the Linux results, and MySQL lags far behind any of those on > Win Server 2008." Which is, again, not necessarily a statement about > MySQL performance vs. PostgreSQL performance at all--for all we know > it's because the MySQL PHP driver is garbage. > Hey Greg, I did not write the benchmarks - the benchmarks are comparing ASP.NET with PHP and if I was using either then you would want to take into account the drivers because they are all part of the same package as far as developers care. Benchmarks are one-off comparissons and I do not claim anything about the ones posted in the article other than they are good press for Postgres -especially coming from a Microsoft employee - especially since they provide some elusive benchmarks on SQL Server. >> Note that the linux version they were comparing was Ubuntu - which I >> know from personal experience has very poor default settings for >> shared_buffers due to Ubuntu's operating system defaults. Perhaps if >> theses parameters were altered postgres would get a clean sweep. > The parameters are no better on a default Windows install. > The postgres wiki notes lead me to believe that the shared_buffers settings are not as important on windows as Linux. I am not going to run the tests to find out - I am accepting these results as in the light they are given - Pro Postgres :) Howard Cole www.selestial.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: