Re: BUG #5242: ODBC driver v8.4.1 crashed
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5242: ODBC driver v8.4.1 crashed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B27E4B6.7000702@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5242: ODBC driver v8.4.1 crashed (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5242: ODBC driver v8.4.1 crashed
Re: BUG #5242: ODBC driver v8.4.1 crashed |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió: > >> hmm - not sure that is too clear especially because I don't think >> ther is only JDBC/ODBC or pgadmin (nor do I think you names match up >> with how they are really called). what about doing it the other way >> round like: >> >> "This bug report form can be used for reporting bugs and problems >> with the PostgreSQL database, for problems with database connectors, >> graphical administration tools or other external projects please >> report to them directly. Alternatively you can look at the available >> <a href='/community/lists'>mailing lists</a> and see if there is a >> more apropriate list available." > > I think it's a good idea to mention some specific more problematic names > like the three listed. yeah maybe - but afaik the products are not named "psql-odbc" or "pgsql-jdbc" - those are more or less list names and likely not of much more use than not listening them at all :). Plus a lot of the surounding projects (like pgadmin, slony or most pgfoundry projects) have their own bug/issue reporting/tracking infrastructure. I'm all open for better wordings - any other takers? :) Stefan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: