Re: new CommitFest states

Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think there should be a transition from Returned with Feedback
> back to Waiting for review.  Granted we might allow that occasionally
> as an exceptional case, but normally Returned with Feedback is a final
> state.
>   
I did throw some disclaimers in the notes about this particular subject 
at the bottom of the table.  The main reason I put that in there is that 
sometimes a reviewer or even the CF manager (I did this myself once this 
time) will mark something "Returned with feedback", thinking there's no 
way the issues pointed out can be addressed right now.  And then, a day 
or two later, in comes a patch that does just that; surprise!  Since it 
seems to happen anyway, and I'd prefer not to get in the position where 
people are screaming "you threw me out with 'RWF' unfairly", I thought 
it was better to accept that possibility so long as the whole thing is 
tightly bounded as far as how much time the author has to do it.

> (Also, Waiting for review is actually the wrong name for the state
> it's trying to talk about.)
>   
Uh, what are you talking about here?

-- 
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com