Re: Winflex

Dave Page wrote:
>   
>>> The other possible option that I hesitate to suggest is Windows
>>> Services for Unix or SUA as I think it's now called.
>>>       
>> You mean we should post flex to that? Or have you found someone who has already?
>>     
>
> No idea if someone has done it already. I'm just throwing it out there
> as an idea possibly worthy of further investigation.
>   


Don't you need to have SUA installed to run a program built with SUA? Or 
are you suggesting we can build a distributable flex executable with SUA 
which would run standalone (as I did for 32bit Windows using Cygwin)? 
Requiring developers to install SUA would be quite a siginificant extra 
burden, ISTM.

cheers

andrew