Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B21189E.1000102@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dne 10.12.09 15:51, Bernd Helmle napsal(a): > > > --On 8. Dezember 2009 11:10:44 +0100 Zdenek Kotala > <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> wrote: > >> If you think that it is better I could split patch into two separate >> patches and both can be reviewed separately. > > I split up this patch into two separate patches: one for SLRU and one > for the executor probes. I've done some documentation on the SLRU part, > maybe you can look over it (to make sure i didn't break anything). > > I left the executor probes out of the documentation for now, since it > seems not to be clear how they would manifest. > > Out of curiosity: Why do we want to pass the SlruCtl pointer down to the > probes? I don't understand what those probes are going to do with those > pointers, can you explain? > You need to determine which SLRU is used. Because SLRUs are initialized during startup pointer should be same in all backends.If I think more about it. Maybe it could be goot to add probe also into SimpleLruInit to catch name of SLRUs. Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: