Re: use log_statement to log only SELECTs?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: use log_statement to log only SELECTs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B17055A.3020506@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: use log_statement to log only SELECTs? (Brian Witt <bwitt@bart.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Brian Witt wrote: > Thanks for the response. I was afraid of that. Can I make this a > feature request? How do I do that? Should I add it to this page: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo > Generally it's better to see if there's at least some general support for an idea before adding it to the TODO list. In this case, I don't think you'll find any. The current way you get everything out of log_statement is completely reasonable for most people, and I doubt you'll ever get one of the folks who hack on PostgreSQL to work on the feature you'd like unless you paid them to. You'd need a much better justification for why you can't just filter things out of the log yourself before it would be worth further complicating the code involved. It's just not a common request--if anything, you might find people want everything *but* SELECTs. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: