Re: RAID card recommendation
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RAID card recommendation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B15D5C4.5040604@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RAID card recommendation (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RAID card recommendation
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Carey wrote: > 3ware 95xx and 96xx had performance somewhere between PERC 5 (horrid) and > PERC 6 (mediocre) when I tested them with large SATA drives with RAID 10. > Haven't tried raid 6 or 5. Haven't tried the "SA" model that supports SAS The only models I've tested and recommended lately are exactly those though. The 9690SA is the earliest 3ware card I've mentioned as seeming to have reasonable performance. The 95XX cards are certainly much slower than similar models from, say, Areca. I've never had one of the earlier 96XX models to test. Now you've got me wondering what the difference between the earlier and current 96XX models really is. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: