Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B142ACA.3070409@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
Re: Block-level CRC checks Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > Proposal > > * We reserve enough space on a disk block for a CRC check. When a dirty > block is written to disk we calculate and annotate the CRC value, though > this is *not* WAL logged. Imagine this: 1. A hint bit is set. It is not WAL-logged, but the page is dirtied. 2. The buffer is flushed out of the buffer cache to the OS. A new CRC is calculated and stored on the page. 3. Half of the page is flushed to disk (aka torn page problem). The CRC made it to disk but the flipped hint bit didn't. You now have a page with incorrect CRC on disk. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: