Re: Postgres database performance on 6 core Opteron vs 4 core Xeon
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres database performance on 6 core Opteron vs 4 core Xeon |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B13E5C1.9040701@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres database performance on 6 core Opteron vs 4 core Xeon (Postgres User <postgres.developer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres database performance on 6 core Opteron vs 4
core Xeon
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Postgres User wrote: > The 6 core processor should offer a clear edge but these AMD > processors are cited for relatively slow L3 cache speeds compared to > their Intel counterparts. > The big problem is that the raw memory speed in the Intel Nehelem designs (with 3-channel DDR3 1333MHz) is so superior to AMD's right now (dual-channel DDR2-800) that even two extra cores can't pull them ahead in a lot of tasks. And Intel's hyperthreading support on the new processors is really effective, so you're actually evaluating an 8-core Intel solution vs. a 6-core AMD one. Take a look at http://it.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3571&p=5 for example, which is a pretty realistic database benchmarking app where AMD gets spanked. At this point, the new Opterons close a lot of gap against Intel's designs, but the gap is still there. It can be easy to justify AMD purchases anyway on a cost/power basis, as Intel's stuff is still expensive and might run hotter for some workloads. But make no mistake: if you want the best possible performance without going completely crazy price-wise, Intel still owns that category, for one or two processor installs at least. Some of AMD's redesign aims to help in larger servers with 4 processors instead, the "HT Assist" feature. See http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/06/they-might-be-profitable-amds-six-core-istanbul-reviewed.ars for an intro. I'm not optimistic for AMD here though either. By the time we start seeing those, Intel will have their Nehalem-EX chips out, which given Intel's track record I expect will return them to crushing AMD at the high-end again. Returning to the real world of database performance, every dollar spent on your processors and expensive memory is one you can't spend on disks instead, so in reality AMD's cost effectiveness can make for a better overall database system at the same price point. If you really need a lot of disks to make your app performance well, better to focus on that rather than trivia like how fast stuff moves around the memory bus. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: