Re: bytea and text
От | Jean-Yves F. Barbier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bytea and text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B1285A1.6060207@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bytea and text (Kris Kewley <kris.kewley@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Kris Kewley a écrit : > Some interesting points were made. Depending on the roadmap for you > application consideration should be given to storing the image files > outside of the db. > > IMO the driving factors here are: > 1. Scalability > 2. Version control of images > 3. Backup > 4. Performance > > Including images in your db will accerlate it's growth. You noted legal > concerns, version control is typically an important aspect of this. Back > up and restore time will increase as db size is larger, and will be more > costly (assume db on more expensive disk than file server). Finally > performance.. Blobs typically increase disk io on queries (at least they > do in oracle) so should be used judicially in heavily accessed tables. These tables are not heavily accessed: they're linked to heavily accessed other tables. They only contains an id, a RI, a pic_nb and a bytea. Pictures are practically never upgraded and jettisoned when obsolete. > Realize that I have made some wild assumptions about your app here, but > this is my experience. > > Consider a link in your db and using cvs for storing the images, or > filesystem depending on the extent of to your needs. NO, I want only one backup solution, not one for each case; and perfs are only needed for other tables. > I too stand to be corrected :-) I see, you're doing BDSM :D JY -- Leave no stone unturned. -- Euripides
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: