Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B020E32.7040407@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, the prudent thing to do in your situation is to issue a CYA memo that says something like "I think the hardware is OK, but due to large number of bugs in PostgreSQL 8.0.4 on Windows it's easy for the database to become corrupted anyway", point toward http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release.html to support that claim and note that 8.0.22 is the absolutely minimum version anyone should be running, then CC everyone up the management chain. You're using a version that considers your data quite tasty and would like to make a snack of it at the first opportunity that arises.cb <cb@mythtech.net> writes:Ugh, yeah, I'd love to upgrade but the powers that get to make that decision have no interest in upgrading. So I'm stuck on 8.0.4,Make sure you're not in the line of fire when (not if) that version eats your data. Particularly on Windows, insisting on not upgrading that version is unbelievably, irresponsibly stupid. There are a *large* number of known bugs.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: