Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AE5FBFB.7090400@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas? ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas?
Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote: > Howdy, > > Very excited about the new `DO` command in 8.5a2. I read through the > patch review thread and found that, like me, Dim had expected it to > behave more like a lambda than a simple command. And from Tom's > comments, it looks like it was committed in such a way to make such > extensions possible (passing arguments, returning values (maybe even > sets?). > > So I was wondering if anyone has thought about adding such > functionality, and if so, what it might look like? > > If the answer is "no, because we want to see what cow paths develop in > 8.5," that's fine with me. I'll just be chasing cows. :-) > > It was discussed and rejected, at least for now. See earlier discussion. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: