Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4ACA76AE.3090402@pjmodos.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): <blockquote cite="mid:18007.1254771245@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Petr Jelinek <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:pjmodos@pjmodos.net"><pjmodos@pjmodos.net></a> writes: </pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">[ latest default-ACLs patch ] </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> Applied with a fair amount of editorial polishing. Notably I changed the permissions requirements a bit: </pre></blockquote><br /> Thank you very much Tom.<br /><br /><blockquote cite="mid:18007.1254771245@sss.pgh.pa.us"type="cite"><pre wrap="">One thing that seems like it's likely to be an annoyancein practice is the need to explicitly do DROP OWNED BY to get rid of pg_default_acl entries for a role to be dropped. But I can't see any very good way around that, since the entries might be in some other database. One thing that might at least reduce the number of keystrokes is to have REASSIGN OWNED act as DROP OWNED BY for default ACLs. I can't convince myself whether that's a good idea though, so I left it as-is for the moment. </pre></blockquote><br /> Yeah I am not happy about this either but there is not much we can do about it. Btw I thinkin the version I sent in REASSIGN OWNED acted as DROP OWNED for default ACLs.<br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature"cols="72">-- Regards Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)</pre>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: