Re: How useful is the money datatype?
От | justin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How useful is the money datatype? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AC921DC.1070102@emproshunts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How useful is the money datatype? (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Rich Shepard wrote: > > In the early and mid-1980s we used a procedure for business > applications > involving money that worked regardless of programming language or > platform. > To each (float, real) monetary amount we added 0.005 and truncated the > result > to two digits on the right of the decimal point. In almost all cases, > this > allowed financial calculations to be correct to the nearest penny. > > Financial calculations are still imperfect. Now and then I see this in > both my business and personal bank statements when reconciliation is > off by > a penny or two. The transaction amounts (debits and credits) match, > but the > bank comes out with a different total than do I. This is usually only > for a > month or two before we are once again in agreement. > > Rich > > Rich what causes the difference you are referring to is method used to round, bankers rounding aka (round to even) vs basic rounding we are taught in school aka (round half up). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding General what i do is leave more digits in the number than is needed then round after all the calculations are done... A common problem applications/databases suffer from is inconsistent precision. In one place the database is using 4 digits another 6 in another 0 and in another 2 digits. Be consistent in the use of precision if not, be prepared to untangle a nightmare. The money type i have found is absolutely worthless when doing math but using it to simplify formating great. select 123456789::text::money; set session lc_monetary to 'fr_FR.UTF-8'; select 123456789::text::money
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: