Re: syslog_line_prefix
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AC120FC.4080500@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: syslog_line_prefix (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >>> syslog uses a nonblocking file descriptor without a retry loop to >>> implement their logic. I see no reason we couldn't do that ourselves. >>> Mixing it with regular blocking code could turn out to be nontrivial, >>> but I don't think it's impossible. >>> > > >> Well, for CSV logs it's a complete non-starter. We go to quite a deal of >> trouble to ensure we don't miss messages, because if we do the CSVs will >> be hopelessly corrupted. >> > > You could make it work if write() had all-or-nothing semantics, so that > you could write or discard a whole logical message at once. But I don't > believe that's guaranteed for any interesting cases. > > > Right. That's part of why we had to invent the chunking protocol between the backends and the syslogger, IIRC. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: