Re: Hot Standby on git
От | Mark Mielke |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby on git |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4ABE28FD.7060404@mark.mielke.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby on git (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby on git
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/26/2009 10:04 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> If you think there's >> something useful I could do, let me know and I'll take a look. >> > I feel like I need a better way of unit testing new code. Some of the > code in the patch is to handle corner cases, so recreating them is > fairly hard. It is a nagging feeling that I am missing some knowledge > here and would welcome some insight, or research, into better ways of > doing general case unit testing. > You might try and steal ideas from EasyMock / PowerMock - but not sure how well the ideas map to C. Generally it means allowing the functions to be called from a "mock" environment, where subroutine calls that might be called are stubbed out to return sample data that would simulate your scenario. Object oriented languages that require every object to provide an interface where most object methods can be overridden are more ideal for performing this sort of test. I rarely ever see this sort of stuff in FOSS projects, and never that I can remember in FOSS C projects. It's not easy, though. I assume you are doing it through code changing right now. Commenting out lines, replacing them with others, etc? Cheers, mark -- Mark Mielke<mark@mielke.cc>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: