Re: generic copy options
От | Emmanuel Cecchet |
---|---|
Тема | Re: generic copy options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AB24B4C.8090404@asterdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: generic copy options (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: generic copy options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com> writes: > >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> psql has MORE need to support old syntax than the backend does, because >>> it's supposed to work against old servers. >>> >>> >> Well, I wonder how many users just upgrade psql vs upgrade the server. >> > > We have established a project policy that psql backslash commands will > support servers at least back to 7.4, and a great deal of work has > already been expended in support of that goal. It is not within the > charter of this patch to ignore or redefine that policy. > Does that mean that we can drop the 7.3 syntax or should we just keep it? For future references, where can I find the various project policies? Thanks Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Cecchet Aster Data Systems Web: http://www.asterdata.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: