Re: Ragged CSV import
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ragged CSV import |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AAA6CCD.10502@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ragged CSV import (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ragged CSV import
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> I wrote: >> >>> I'd love to be able to do something like >>> >>> INSERT into foo (x,y,z) select t[3],[t2],[t57] from (COPY RETURNING >>> t FROM stdin CSV); >>> > > >> Some IRC discussion suggested ways we could do better than that syntax. >> I think my current preferred candidate is something like >> > > >> COPY foo (a,b,c) >> FROM stdin >> CSV >> AS t USING (t[3],t[2],[t57]); >> > > [ scratches head... ] What happened to seeing COPY as a data source in > a larger command? If that syntax has anything at all to recommend it, > I'm not seeing what. It's not extensible and it would require lots of > code duplication to implement the impoverished feature set it does have. > > > Well, I think the objection was that it would slow COPY down to have to go though the executor in the copy-as-source scenario. But maybe that would happen anyway, and maybe we don't care, we'd just accept that it wouldn't be nearly as fast as a raw copy. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: