Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AA8C1AF020000250002AC14@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > There are languages much less obscure than Haskell that support > passing functions as arguments to other functions, such as C. Or Java, which lets you, for example, pass a Class or Method as an argument, and includes support for generics. I see that pgfoundry has pl/Java, which has an activity percentile of 91.08%. I'm not sure whether this could address the needs that started this discussion, since I assume such capabilities would only be usable when invoking one Java method from another. I'm just saying -- these features aren't all that esoteric; we use introspection and reflection within our Java software. While we probably wouldn't use such features in PostgreSQL (if they were there) because of our portability mandate; I can certainly understand those who don't mind PostgreSQL-specific code and want to move more of the business logic to the DBMS wanting such features. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: