Re: Prepared Statement Query Planning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Oliver Jowett
Тема Re: Prepared Statement Query Planning
Дата
Msg-id 4A98ED05.6090302@opencloud.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Prepared Statement Query Planning  (Brett Henderson <brett@bretth.com>)
Ответы Re: Prepared Statement Query Planning
Список pgsql-jdbc
Brett Henderson wrote:

> The full JDBC trace with loglevel=2 is below.  Is it possible to tell
> whether server side prepared statements are being used from this?  Note
> that this has been obtained from a windows laptop running PostgreSQL
> 8.3.5, but the real problem is occurring on an Ubuntu Linux server
> running PostgreSQL 8.3.7.  The same JDBC driver is being used across the
> board.

> 17:48:46.443 (1)  FE=> Parse(stmt=S_2,query="SELECT e.id, e.version,
> e.timestamp, e.visible, u.data_public, u.id AS user_id, u.display_name,
> e.changeset_id, e.latitude, e.longitude FROM nodes e LEFT OUTER JOIN
> changesets c ON e.changeset_id = c.id LEFT OUTER JOIN users u ON
> c.user_id = u.id WHERE e.timestamp > $1 AND e.timestamp <= $2 ORDER BY
> e.id, e.version",oids={0,0})
> 17:48:46.444 (1)  FE=> Describe(statement=S_2)
> 17:48:46.444 (1)  FE=> Bind(stmt=S_2,portal=C_3,$1=<1970-01-01
> 10:00:00.000000 +10:00:00>,$2=<2009-08-28 17:48:45.932000 +10:00:00>)
> 17:48:46.445 (1)  FE=> Execute(portal=C_3,limit=10000)
> 17:48:46.445 (1)  FE=> Sync

This is using a named statement (S_2 is the name)

It looks like you're using setFetchSize(). That forces use of a named
statement regardless of prepareThreshold (we have to keep the statement
and corresponding portal alive so we can do subsequent fetches, even if
there are some other intervening queries, so we can't use the unnamed
statement)

-O

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brett Henderson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Prepared Statement Query Planning
Следующее
От: Mario Splivalo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inserting 'large' amounts of data