Re: Index-only quals
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index-only quals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A8E9218.2070206@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index-only quals (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Heikki > Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Here is an updated version of my patch to return data from b-tree >> indexes, and use it to satisfy quals. > > + if (!found_clause && useful_pathkeys == NIL && !useful_predicate) > + ipath->scantype = ST_INDEXSCAN; > + else > + { > + ipath->scantype = 0; > + if (index->amhasgettuple) > + ipath->scantype |= ST_INDEXSCAN; > + if (index->amhasgetbitmap) > + ipath->scantype |= ST_BITMAPSCAN; > + } > + > > > Does this section need to check amhasgettuple for the index-only scan > case as well? It looks like right now if an indexam has amregurgitate > set but not amhasgettuple then weird things could happen. We check earlier in the function before we construct indexonlyQuals that the index has amhasgettuple. Hmm, can you find an easier-to-understand way to write that? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: