Re: Multi-pass planner
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi-pass planner |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A8E202C.6030008@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi-pass planner (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi-pass planner
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't think it's a bad idea, I just think you have to set your > expectations pretty low. If the estimates are bad there isn't really > any plan that will be guaranteed to run quickly. Well, the way to do this is via a risk-confidence system. That is, each operation has a level of risk assigned to it; that is, the cost multiplier if the estimates are wrong. And each estimate has a level of confidence attached. Then you can divide the risk by the confidence, and if it exceeds a certain level, you pick another plan which has a lower risk/confidence level. However, the amount of extra calculations required for even a simple query are kind of frightning. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: