Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A79ECDF.4020700@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Josh's position that "this should be standard SQL" is nonsense, or > at least he ought to be making that argument to the standards committee > not us. Huh? When did I say that? > If we want something built-in, maybe providing some prefab plpgsql > functions is the way to go. But we'd have to arrive at a consensus > on what best practice of that form looks like. *Built-in* functions are just as good as extra syntax, as far as I'm concerned. Functions which require installing plpgsql, reading the docs, creating a function, pasting it in, and saving it are NOT as good; they are unlikely to ever be used, except by the people who didn't really need them in the first place. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: