Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?
От | Paul Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A783F5B.6090500@fastmail.fm обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?
Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Paul Taylor <ijabz@fastmail.fm>: > > >> Sam Mason wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Paul Taylor wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Does postgres have an embedded mode to allow a database to be embedded >>>> with Java application without requiring seperate db manager, like the >>>> derby database does ? >>>> >>> No, and I think the consensus is that this would be bad. See: >>> >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ#Can_PostgreSQL_be_embedded.3F >>> >> Thats a shame, I wanted to write junit test for a java program that >> queried a database, requiring a full database to be available for unit >> tests is not really an environment I want to have. >> > > Has it occurred to you that testing a DB client when there's no > DB isn't really a very accurate or realistic test? > > I am testing the code that extracts information from a read only database. These are UNIT tests so only interested in getting the right results given a particular set of data, anything else is a distraction. Paul
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: