Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:18:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> KaiGai,
>>
>> * KaiGai Kohei (kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
>>> I began to describe the list of abstraction layer functions (but not completed yet):
>>>   http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Abstraction
>> I'm not really a huge fan of 'security_' as a prefix for these
>> functions, but I don't have a better suggestion right now.
> 
> Just generally, "access control" is a great way to describe what's
> actually happening here.  That people conflate access control with
> security has resulted in a number of disasters :P

My concern is "access_control_" is a bit long for prefixes,
but "ac_" is too short to represent what it is doing.

-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>