Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications

Robert Haas wrote:
> If you want to store intelligence data about the war in Iraq and
> intelligence data about the war in Afghanistan, it might not be too
> bad to store them in separate databases, though storing them in the
> same database might also make things simpler for users who have access
> to both sets of data.  But if you have higher and lower
> classifications of data it's pretty handy (AIUI) to be able to let the
> higher-secrecy users read the lower-secrecy data 

Nice example.

Is this system being designed flexibly enough so that one user may
have access to the higher-secrecy data of the Iraq dataset but only
the lower-secrecy Afghanistan dataset; while a different user may have
access to the higher-secrecy Afghanistan data but only the lower-secrecy
Iraq data?

I imagine it's not uncommon for organizations to want to have total
access to "their" data, but expose more limited access to other
organizations they communicate with.