Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A6C494B.3040304@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei wrote: > > The SELinux provides a certain process privilege to make backups and > restore them. In the (currect) default policy, it is called "unconfined". > > However, it is also *possible* to define a new special process privilege > for backup and restore tools. For example, it can access all the databse > objects and can make backups, but any other process cannot touch the > backup files. It means that DBA can launch a backup tool and it creates > a black-boxed file, then he cal also lauch a restore tool to restore > the black-boxed backup, but he cannot see the contents of the backup. > (It might be a similar idea of "sudo" mechanism.) > > Really? How you enforce this black box rule for a backup made across the network? From the server's POV there is no such thing as a backup. All it sees is a set of SQL statements all of which it might see in some other context. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: