Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A64F547.6090304@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall (APseudoUtopia <apseudoutopia@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Server Backup: pg_dump vs pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-general |
APseudoUtopia wrote: > Hey, > > I'm writing a backup script. Right now, I only have one database on my > postgresql server. I'm deciding if I should use pg_dump or pg_dumpall > when backing up the server. As far as I can tell, pg_dumpall cannot > compress the dumps automatically and it only dumps data in the > standard SQL text file format. This means that I would not be able to > use pg_restore to selectively restore the database, correct? > > What is *NOT* included in a pg_dump that IS in pg_dumpall (Other than > all the databases)? Things like user-defined functions and datatypes? > Roles? Views? views are part of a database, so they are included, so are user defined functions. whats not included are, primarily, roles/users. > > I was leaning towards pg_dumpall, but then I realized that it only > dumps in the standard SQL text file format, and it cannot be > compressed automatically. pgdumpall .... | gzip > dumpfile.sql.gz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: