Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A64C692.1030109@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193 (Joshua Brindle <method@manicmethod.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Brindle wrote: > How many people are you looking for? Is there a number or are you > waiting for a good feeling? Is it individuals or organizations people are looking for? I see KaiGai wrote "In addition, I (and NEC) can provide our capability to the PostgreSQL community to keep these security features work correctly. " Does that imply that a larger part of NEC is interested? > The unfortunate part is that many of the people that would use it are > unable to publicly say so. Could they publicly say something softer. I see SELinux had a number of large organizations (NSA) and publicly traded companies (Secure Computing Corp, Network Associates, etc) pushing it and contributing to it. If people who could speak for those organizations were here saying "ooh, and such features in a F/OSS database would be interesting too", that would probably convince a lot of people. Joshua - if you're still associated with Tresys - could someone who could speak for that company say what they think about this project? The seem quite in-the-loop on what SELinux customers want.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: