Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A5DFE0D.5000604@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dne 14.07.09 04:37, Bruce Momjian napsal(a): <blockquote cite="mid:200907140237.n6E2b2x27210@momjian.us" type="cite"><prewrap="">Tom Lane wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Bruce Momjian <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:bruce@momjian.us"><bruce@momjian.us></a> writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><prewrap="">Tilmann Singer wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">However, all of the sequenceswere at the initial values and not bumped up to the last used value as I would have expected. The first nextval call on any sequence in the migrated 8.4 database always returned 1. </pre></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Wow, that is also surprising. I amgoing to have to run some tests to find the cause, but it certainly is not intended. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">Looks like pg_migrator neglects toinclude relkind 'S' in the set of tables that it needs to physically migrate. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> Thanks, I have fixed pg_migrator with the attached patch. Once we find the cause of the lovacuum problem, I will make a new pg_migrator release. </pre></blockquote> I think you don't need transfer sequence table, because pg_dump should create DDL command (CREATE SEQUENCE)which should create new nice sequence relation.<br /><br /> Zdenek<br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: