Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A5B8DE8.4070406@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC] obtaining the function call stack (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > This is a preliminary request for comments on obtaining a function call > stack. I've been trying to dodge the issue by exporting elog.c internal > state (errcontext), but that turns out to be unfeasible and it's such a > horrid kludge anyway. > > So, the idea is to have a stack maintained by the function manager; each > called function enters an element in it containing the interesting > information about the function. We'd have another function that would > return this stack as a result set. (With this arrangement, the topmost > element would always appear to be this "peek" function.) > > I haven't looked at the code to see how this would actually be > implemented, so I don't have more details to offer. Does anybody have > opinions on the matter? FWIW, pldebugger obtains a function call stack by peeking into the error context stack. It only includes PLpgSQL functions, and it's ugly and hacky. Something cleaner would simplify pldebugger, although it's always going to be hacky since it needs to understand quite a lot about PLpgSQL internal structures to display variables and stuff. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: