Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

Tom Lane wrote:
> As best I can tell after some casual testing on a couple of machines,
> the actual bottom line is that "raw_parser" (ie, the bison and flex
> processing) is going to be a couple of percent slower with a reentrant
> grammar and lexer, for typical queries involving a lot of short tokens.
> Now this disappears into the noise as soon as you include parse analysis
> (let alone planning and execution), but it is possible to measure the
> slowdown in a test harness that calls raw_parser only.
>
> A possible compromise that I think would avoid most or all of the
> slowdown is to make the lexer reentrant but not the grammar (so that
> yylval and yylloc remain as global variables instead of being parameters
> to yylex).  I haven't actually benchmarked that, though.  It strikes
> me as a fairly silly thing to do.  If we're going to go for reentrancy
> I think we should fix both components.
>
> I'm willing to live with the small slowdown.  Comments?
>
>             
>   


If we're going to have a reentrant lexer, I think we should go the whole 
nine yards. I agree that a couple of percent slowdown on just the lexing 
and parsing will be lost in the noise. So +1 from me.

cheers

andrew