Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A4CC5B9.5070303@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I'd like to return to the project I suggested here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/18653.1239741426@sss.pgh.pa.us > of getting rid of plpgsql's private lexer and having it use the core > lexer instead. This will require making the core lexer re-entrant, > which is not possible with our oldest supported version of flex > (2.5.4a). A look at the flex change history indicates that %reentrant > was added in 2.5.6 but nasty bugs were being fixed up to 2.5.30; > so the new minimum supported version would probably be 2.5.33 > (2.5.31 was kinda broken for other reasons, and there was no 2.5.32). > > Since 2.5.33 is now over three years old, this does not seem like an > onerous requirement, but I thought I'd better ask if anyone has an > objection? > > > I think it would need to be benchmarked. My faint recollection is that the re-entrant lexers are slower. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: