Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
От | KaiGai Kohei |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A47FD8D.8090705@ak.jp.nec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bernd Helmle wrote: > --On 26. Juni 2009 13:08:37 +0900 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> > wrote: > >> * Is the named large object (including fully qualified one) worth? >> It will enables us to specify a largeobject with human readable >> identifier string. > > I don't understand the notion of this. Does this mean you can create a > LO with an identifier string, generated from (e.g.) your application? Yes, it intends to assign an identifier string not only numeric large object identifier. The identifier string can be qualified with a certain namespace as follows. E.g)SELECT lo_open('my_picture01', x'40000'::int);SELECT lo_create('pg_temp.my_musid02'); In the later case, the new largeobject will be reclaimed after the session closed due to the temporary namespace. Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: