Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?

Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to remove the include directory in PG_CPPFLAGS
>> as well? Seems it is equally unused...
> 
> No. I agree to remove PG_CPPFLAGS.

The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
until the tree opens for 8.5. It's not a very likely scenario that
anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....


-- Magnus HaganderSelf: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/