Re: Extensions User Design
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extensions User Design |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A429D6F.8050507@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extensions User Design (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extensions User Design
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Andrew, > >> Actually, I think we should be like Perl here. There is a list of >> standard modules that comes with the base Perl distro, and then there >> are addons, such as you find on CPAN. File::Find is an example of a >> standard module, DBD::Pg is an example of an addon. > > Actually, chromatic, Allison, etc. regard the Standard Modules as a > mistake and are talking about moving away from having any for Perl 6. > > On the other hand, their main reason for doing this (the issues with > maintaining the included version and the CPAN version separately) > wouldn't apply to us. I agree they have too many. I think moving to none would be a mistake, though. Would they even drop things like Dynaloader or ExtUtils::MakeMaker? That would be crazy, IMNSHO. I think there's a sweet spot here and we are not very far away from it in the number of things we currently ship. > > On the third hand, having "all modules equal, just some recommended" > approach woudl make it far easier to drop a module which went > unmaintained, e.g. CUBE. But some people may regard this as a > misfeature. I would happily push cube out of the nest now :-) cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: