Re: security checks for largeobjects?
От | KaiGai Kohei |
---|---|
Тема | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A403233.4090700@ak.jp.nec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: security checks for largeobjects? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: security checks for largeobjects?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:31:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are >>>> internal, no? >>> It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to >>> objects on the file system directly. >> LO's are transaction-controlled, and they're not (readily) >> accessible from outside the database. Seems rather completely >> different from regular filesystem files. > > Not according to SQL/MED. > >> (In any case, there wasn't anything I liked about SQL/MED's ideas >> about external files, so I'm not in favor of modeling LO management >> after that.) > > Good point ;) > > Cheers, > David. I would like to develop the feature independent from SQL/MED. -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: