Re: Block_Size on NTFS
От | postgresqlgeneral.domain.thewild_codata@spamgourmet.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block_Size on NTFS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A2E56A8.2070406@codata.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block_Size on NTFS (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block_Size on NTFS
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian - bruce@momjian.us a écrit : > postgresqlgeneral.domain.thewild_codata@spamgourmet.com wrote: >> Reading through the list of settings returned by "SHOW ALL", I noticed >> the "block_size" variable, which defaults to 8192. >> >> Running on Windows Server, my data directory is on an NTFS partition. >> Running CHKDSK on this partition tells me that there are "4096 bytes in >> each allocation unit." >> >> Are these allocation units the same as the "block_size", or does this >> only have to do with disk geometry ? >> If they are the same, is it important that they match ? > > It is not necessary they match. It just means that Postgres extends > files in 8k chunks while your file system extends them in 4k chunks. Thanks for your answer Bruce. So I guess it is good practice to have postgresql's "block_size" set to an exact multiplie of the filesystem's block_size, right ? Regards -- Arnaud Lesauvage
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: