Re: warm standby with WAL shipping
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: warm standby with WAL shipping |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A2660BF.9050807@serioustechnology.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: warm standby with WAL shipping ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 19:44 -0400, Geoffrey wrote: >> >>> pg_standby it self isn't a solution for warm standby. It is a component >>> thereof. Also don't use SCP. Use rsync. Take a look at walmgr or >>> PITRTools it will make your life easier. >> I still don't understand why the pg_standby code is looking for the >> *.history. Apparently others have seen this same behavior (according to >> google), yet I don't see any definitive answer. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/warm-standby.html > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL > > I think will have what you want. I have read this documentation, unfortunately a couple of times. Is the section '24.3.4 Timelines' referencing these *.history files? Is there any documentation out there that specifically lays out what the files are and how they are processed? Or, is that what I'm looking at in 24.3.4? >> It appears the PITRTools use pg_standby binary, thus I'm still confused >> as to how these files are processed. >> > > Yes it does use pg_standby. It just wraps everything that is missing for > warm standby into a single utility. Looking at the pg_standby.c I have, I don't see a reference to scp or rsync. If I use the PITRTools, is there a different version or do I need to modify this version to use rsync. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: