Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A25569C.8070906@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:47 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> pg_standby can use ln command to restore an archived file, >> which might destroy the archived file as follows. >> >> 1) pg_standby creates the symlink to the archived file '102' >> 2) '102' is applied >> 3) the next file '103' doesn't exist and the trigger file is created >> 4) '102' is re-fetched >> 5) at the end of recovery, the symlink to '102' is rename to '202', >> but it still points '102' >> 6) after recovery, '202' is recycled (rename to '208', which still >> points '102') >> 7) '208' is written new xlog records over >> --> the archived file '102' comes down! >> >> One simple solution to fix this problem... > > err...I don't see *any* problem at all, since pg_standby does not do > step (1) in the way you say and therefore never does step (5). Any links > created are explicitly deleted in all cases at the end of recovery. I don't know how you came to that conclusion, but Fujii-sans description seems accurate to me, and I can reproduce the behavior on my laptop. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: