Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:13 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> I think the big frustration is that this issue was first brought up
>>>> March 25 and it took two months to resolve it, at which point we were in
>>>> beta.  I think many hoped a better idea would emerge but often that just
>>>> doesn't happen and we have to do the best fix we can and move on.
>>> I agree, very frustrating. Why do you bring it up again now? 
>> Wny not?  We are not going to improve unless we face our faults.
> 
> Oh, and I am backlogged on email, which is why I didn't mention it a
> week ago when this thread was active (which I think was your point).  :-)

Did you catch up the backlog far enough to see that Simon coded and I 
committed the patch to add "recovery_end_command" just before beta2? So 
it's in 8.4 now 
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090514203109.8EBA2754067@cvs.postgresql.org).

I agree we could've should've handled this more promptly, and I'll take 
my part of the blame for that. I let the various proposed patches sit 
for long times before reviewing them thoroughly, partly because I was 
busy and partly because I didn't feel good about the proposed 
approaches. I think what went in in the end is pretty simple and robust, 
but it's a shame we had to rush to get it into beta2, after sitting on 
our thumbs for months.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com