Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?
От | Craig James |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A1C6CF8.7000705@emolecules.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Hosted servers with good DB disk performance? (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith wrote: > What I'd love to have is a way to rent a fairly serious piece of > dedicated hardware, ideally with multiple (at least 4) hard drives in a > RAID configuration and a battery-backed write cache. The cache is > negotiable. Linux would be preferred, FreeBSD or Solaris would also > work; not Windows though (see "good DB performance"). We tried this with poor results. Most of the co-location and server-farm places are set up with generic systems that areoptimized for small-to-medium-sized web sites. They use MySQL and are surprised to hear there's an alternative open-sourceDB. They claim to be able to create custom configurations, but it's a lie. The problem is that they run on thin profit margins, and their techs are mostly ignorant, they just follow scripts. If somethinggoes wrong, or they make an error, you can't get anything through their thick heads. And you can't go down thereand fix it yourself. For example, we told them EXACTLY how to set up our system, but they decided that automatic monthly RPM OS updates couldn'thurt. So the first of the month, we in the morning to find that Linux had been updated to libraries that were incompatiblewith our own software, the system automatically rebooted and our web site was dead. And many similar incidents. We finally bought some nice Dell servers and found a co-location site that provides us all the infrastructure (reliable power,internet, cooling, security...), and we're in charge of the computers. We've never looked back. Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: