Re: pg_class and enum types
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_class and enum types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A19BB0E.2000001@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_class and enum types (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_class and enum types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gevik Babakhani wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> >> wrote: >> >>> I was wondering why there is no pg_class record for the enum types. >>> Do we >>> treat the enum types differently? >>> >> >> Because types are stored in pg_type, not pg_class? >> >> ...Robert >> > That is certainly not true.... check the following... > > create type test_type as > ( > field1 integer, > field2 varchar > ); > > select * from pg_class where relname='test_type' It's not so much that enum types are handled specially, but that composite types are. :-) There is no pg_class entry for int either. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: