Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A0D7F48.6070601@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Fujii Masao wrote: >>> When only the history file for timeline 6 is deleted, timeline 6 would be >>> assigned as the newest one *again* at the end of archive recovery. >>> Is this safe? >> If you delete history file and all the WAL for timeline 6, yeah, nothing >> stops it from being reused. It will work just fine, as if it never existed. >> If you still have the history file and WAL for the old timeline 6 lying >> around somewhere else like an older offsite backup, it's easy for the >> administrator to get confused, but there isn't much we can do about that. > > OK, I probably understood your point. The timeline history files whose > timeline ID is larger than that of an oldest backup must not be deleted > from the archive. On the other hand, the smaller or equal one can be > deleted. Not all history files are necessary. So, if we don't keep older > backup, we probably can delete all files in the archive before > pg_start_backup(). > Is my understanding right? Yes, that's correct. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: